professor at the Academy of Fine Arts in Warsaw (1952–85), ran the poster studio; theatre and film posters Warsaw
"We all agreed that [the head of the State Film Agency] should not expect us to design anything that resembled Japanese, American, Russian, or Swiss posters. I was trying to find the essence of the film... I wanted to illustrate this essence with my own language, in my own way."
Biography
Born 10 June 1914 in Warsaw. He graduated in 1934 from the School of Graphic Artists (drawing and lithography), and simultaneously enrolled at the Academy of Fine Arts in Warsaw (1934–1939), where he studied under Professor Mieczysław Kotarbiński. He first worked on a poster in 1936, the same year he began his collaboration with the satirical weekly Szpilka. During the occupation his paintings, drawings and woodcuts were destroyed in the Warsaw Uprising of 1944; that year he published drawings in the underground satirical paper Stańczyk.
After the war he moves to Łódź and continues his collaboration with Szpilki, and in 1947 begins designing film posters for Centrala Wynajmu Filmów (state film distribution), alongside colleagues Tadeusz Trepkowski and Tadeusz Gronowski — in the absence of a commercial client and market research, the poster itself becomes the only form of visual communication around the film. In 1948 he wins five awards at the International Poster Exhibition in Vienna; sources differ in their wording — some cite five gold medals, others five first prizes. He returns to Warsaw in 1950 and designs stage sets for the Syrena Theatre.
From 1952 to 1985 — 33 years — he runs the poster studio at the Academy of Fine Arts in Warsaw, where, by his own testimony, he does not teach a formula but sets philosophical tasks: students draw a visual translation of sayings such as "Always the other thing" or "Life is short", with no prescribed technique. The only student confirmed by name is Wiktor Sadowski (graduated 1981 from his studio); the claim that Franciszek Starowieyski and Andrzej Pągowski also studied with him is not confirmed. He is elected to the Alliance Graphique Internationale in 1957. His poster for the Henry Moore exhibition (1959) becomes a turning point and, in the words of colleagues, an absolute hit — proof that the system of reduction developed on film posters carries over to institutional, cultural commissions as well. He holds the title "Honorary Royal Designer for Industry" from the London Royal Society of Arts (1975; the year is not confirmed, one source gives 1976), and throughout his career won gold medals in Vienna (1948), Leipzig (1965), Warsaw (1970) and Katowice (1967), as well as first prizes in São Paulo (1963), Lahti (1979) and Fort Collins (1981). He died on 11 September 2005 in Warsaw, of progressive nerve degeneration (according to Wikipedia), aged 91.
Unlike post-war Polish posters, which "as a rule were baroque, dark in appearance and melodramatic in content" (under the influence of surrealist monstrosity), Tomaszewski was distinguished by "a non-Polish, almost Czechoslovak capacity for self-irony and wit" (Eye/Icon), which saved him from the stylistic stagnation that overtook many of his peers. He worked directly — with brush and paint on cardboard, with cut-out or painted shapes — deliberately avoiding "complicated photographic techniques"; his originals reveal "how much of it was improvisation," with deliberately unfinished strokes left in and a visible brushstroke worthy of surrealist painters. He described his method as a sequence: "First I think about the question, then about the right answer, then about the best form." To avoid repeating his own style, he practised what he called "professional hygiene" — imagining a mental "double" from another profession so as to look at his own work from an objective distance — and used a musical analogy: "in the simplest musical forms... we hear a variety of sounds; some are distant, some close," warning that a designer who "doesn't change chords is condemned to one kind of sound." Seymour Chwast described him as "he is a great child. Play is what it's all about with him," and Ivan Chermayeff compared him to Picasso for the "childlike sense of creativity" he retained throughout his career.
Influences
Studied with
Mieczysław Kotarbiński — Academy of Fine Arts in Warsaw, 1934–1939
Borrows from
simplification of Socialist Realism's visual codes — turned against its pathos, not in its service
Surrealism and Dada as a vocabulary of gesture (unfinished stroke, visible brush trace, accidental error kept)
jazz as a principle of variation — every work a different 'chord', avoiding a repeated style
folk and circus iconography of postwar Poland — cheap print, greyish paper, free colour register
Influenced
the entire Polish poster school after him — the only named, confirmed student in the available sources is Wiktor Sadowski (graduated 1981 from his studio)
James Victore, Seymour Chwast, Ivan Chermayeff — American designers who publicly cited him as a model (Chermayeff compares him to Picasso for a 'childlike sense of creativity')
Contemporaries
Tadeusz Trepkowski, Tadeusz Gronowski — colleagues at Centrala Wynajmu Filmów in the late 1940s, same state client for film posters
Who he studied under
Mieczysław Kotarbiński — Academy of Fine Arts in Warsaw, 1934–1939. A second named teacher is not confirmed.
What he steals
Simplification of the visual codes of socialist realism — but turned against its pathos, not in its service. Surrealism and dada as a vocabulary of gesture: an unfinished stroke, a visible brush trace, an error kept rather than corrected. Jazz as a principle of variation: each work is a different "chord", the style deliberately does not repeat itself. The folklore and circus iconography of postwar Poland, together with the free, "loose" register of the Polish press of the time (poor colour registration, greyish paper), which he uses as a means, not as a limitation to be hidden.
Who he influenced
The whole Polish poster school after him — Wiktor Sadowski is the only student confirmed by name (graduated 1981 from his studio at the Academy in Warsaw). Outside Poland, James Victore, Seymour Chwast and Ivan Chermayeff have publicly named him as an influence.
Contemporary: Tadeusz Trepkowski and Tadeusz Gronowski — colleagues at Centrala Wynajmu Filmów in the late 1940s, the same state client and the same poor printing conditions.
Difference from the pair already covered:Paul Rand ↔ Tomaszewski — both build their entire method around wit as a tool, but Rand's wit is precise, geometric and calculated down to the pixel (Eye-Bee-M), while Tomaszewski's wit is deliberately unfinished and clumsy by hand — with Rand the joke lands immediately, with Tomaszewski it arrives with a "delayed fuse" (see quote below).
What it is — Lithographic poster for OZN (Obóz Zjednoczenia Narodowego, the semi-official state political bloc of prewar Poland), 1939, 53.3 × 72.4 cm; the earliest work in this note, five years before Tomaszewski developed his recognizable hand-drawn language.
Composition — Photomontage: a row of cannon barrels in the lower left corner, above them a column of marching soldiers spanning the full width, the silhouette of warplanes in flight at the upper left, a portrait of an officer (probably a marshal) fitted in at the right — all layers of photographs montaged one over another, without a single drawn element. The eye enters through the title at the top, descends through the planes toward the cannons and troops.
Colour — Monochrome, sepia-beige tones of photographic paper; the contrast is carried by black printed text, not by colour.
Typography — Printed capital letters arranged in three blocks of different sizes ("GWAŁT ZADAWANY SIŁĄ, MUSI BYĆ SIŁĄ ODPARTY" largest at the top; "SWEGO NIE DAMY / NAPASTNIKA ZWYCIĘŻYMY" medium; a small block of text about general mobilization next to the portrait) — it has nothing to do with his later hand lettering, it is entirely conventional propaganda typography of its time.
Message — Three-second test: military force (cannons, planes, column) plus a call to defend — readable as a mobilization call even without reading the text. From five metres the motif of marching and weaponry remains recognizable.
Why exactly this way — In 1939, on the eve of war, photomontage is the standard language of state propaganda across Europe (a legacy of Soviet and German constructivist posters); the young Tomaszewski (25 years old) is working in a prescribed idiom, not his own.
What would kill it — Nothing in this work carries his later signature. Its value is purely documentary: it shows the starting point and thereby measures how complete the later break with this language actually was.
Principles: —
To verify against the image: The typeface has not been identified. The name of the officer in the portrait is not confirmed in the record.
02 · Urok Szatana — poster for the film by René Clair (1954)
What it is — Lithographic poster for the Polish distribution of the French film La Beauté du Diable (directed by René Clair, 1950, with Gérard Philipe), 1954, 58 × 85 cm (Stedelijk Fi_P-7); the MoMA record has no image, but preserves a direct quote from the designer about his intent.
Composition — Three male figures in a row, with the same silhouette of hat and coat, arranged left to right like a filmic sequence of frames: the first entirely black, a solid silhouette; the second with the outline of the coat thinning into cream, as though losing density; the third entirely green, in a distorted, "melted" run — one figure in three states of transformation. The film's title sits in a small block at the bottom centre, below the third figure.
Colour — Three values: black (solid, material), cream/the white of the paper (vanishing), green (diabolical, unstable). Colour here literally measures the degree of transformation, it does not decorate.
Typography — Hand-lettered title for the film, small relative to the figures — the text is a signature, the figures carry the story.
Message — Three-second test: the same man, three states, the third state is monstrous-green = the "selling of the soul" of the Faust film story readable as a sequence, before a single letter of the title is read.
Why exactly this way — According to Tomaszewski's own testimony (MoMA), the Polish state client asked that it not resemble a Japanese, American, Russian or Swiss poster — what was asked for was to "find the essence of the film" in his own language. The essence here is literally the sequence of transformation, a filmic sequence reduced to three static images.
What would kill it — If all three figures were the same colour. The entire effect rests on the gradual loss of solidity and materiality across the sequence, not on the difference between individual figures.
Principles:Transformation through a sequence of figuresTo verify against the image: The exact name of the institution whose copy was photographed at the Stedelijk differs in accession number from the MoMA copy; it is considered the same edition of the poster.
03 · Moore — poster for Henry Moore's sculpture exhibition (1959)
What it is — Lithographic poster for an exhibition of Henry Moore's sculptures in Warsaw, 1959, 69.3 × 99.1 cm; a gift from the designer himself to MoMA. According to a secondary source (Seek & Speak / James Victore), this poster is a turning point in which Tomaszewski builds a sculptural garden out of the letterforms themselves.
Composition — A saturated indigo-blue field; the word "MOORE" broken into large white letters across the full width, with the gap enlarged between "M" and "OORE" so that a small grey photographic fragment is fitted into the gap, resembling a sample of a sculptural form — an organic, rounded shape, like a Moore hole-through-form. The eye reads the letter as form before reading it as a word.
Colour — Two values: a deep indigo field and white lettering, with one grey photographic accent. The same logic of reduction as in the film posters, applied to an exhibition, not a sales, task.
Typography — Large, hand-built capital letters. The letter is not a font but a drawn shape whose thickness and spacing are part of the composition, not a later adjustment.
Message — Three-second test: the artist's name alone, broken as though it were itself a sculpture — an abstract form (Moore's hole through stone) translated into the gap between letters, before a single word about the exhibition itself is read.
Why exactly this way — Moore's sculptures build form around a void (a hole through a mass of stone); Tomaszewski translates that principle into typography — the gap between letters becomes the place where form happens, the same trick as in the sculpture.
What would kill it — Even spacing between all the letters. The entire point lies in the irregular, broken spacing that turns the lettering into a sculptural object, not into a legible sign.
Principles:One image, one wordTo verify against the image: which exact Warsaw institution organized the 1959 exhibition is not confirmed.
What it is — Lithographic circus poster, 1961, 67 × 97.5 cm (Stedelijk 1992.2.0115). One of hundreds of "Cyrk" posters that Polish designers made for the state circus administration. Here there is not a single figurative image of a clown or animal.
Composition — The word "CYRK" is set in large, irregularly cut letters, each a different colour and different texture (C green, Y black, R red, K black). It is surrounded by six hand-drawn spirals of different sizes (black, green), one black dot and a tiny red diamond, scattered across a cream ground with no grid or axis.
Colour — Three colours sit on a neutral cream ground (green, black, red), each used both for a letter and for an accompanying graphic mark. Colour links the letter to the spirals into a single visual system, not a separate decoration.
Typography — The letter is a drawing, not a font — each letter is a different shape and colour, as if drawn by a different performer in the show. The imperfection of the cut is deliberate.
Message — Three-second test: the spirals carry the dizziness and movement of the circus, the scattered colourful letters carry playfulness. The message "circus" arrives from the energy of the composition itself, without a single image of a tent, clown or animal.
Why exactly this way — Unlike most "Cyrk" posters, which show a specific act of the programme, here the task is generic — a poster for the genre itself, not for a particular show. Analogy (the spiral as circus movement) is the only possible route without illustrating a scene that doesn't exist.
What would kill it — If all the letters were the same colour and the same cut, the sense of playful discord that the spirals and letters build together would be lost. A single font would turn the poster into an ordinary name, not a visual circus act.
What it is — Lithographic theatre poster for the production "Juliusz Cezar" (Shakespeare) at the Teatr Dramatyczny in Warsaw, 1971, 86.6 × 59 cm.
Composition — A large portrait head on a black background, shaven skull, with two hollow, purple-rimmed whites of the eyes without pupils — like an antique marble or bronze bust, not a living face. The theatre's name in a white block at the top, the play's title in a white block at the bottom — the head fills the entire centre, framed by two texts like an inscription on a monument's pedestal.
Colour — A green head on a black ground — the colour of patina on bronze or mould on old marble, not the colour of living skin; purple only in the eye rims, as the single "bloody" accent on an otherwise deathly palette.
Typography — Printed capital letters in white rectangular fields, strictly separated from the image — the only work in this note where the text is not fitted into the drawing but stands as a nameplate.
Message — Three-second test: a face like a statue means a ruler or historical figure already dead before the play even begins — the green colour announces in advance the decay and murder that is the central event of the drama, before a single name is read.
Why exactly this way — By the time of the production, Caesar is already a symbol, not a person — the statue is the exact right choice because the play begins with historical distance (everyone knows how the story ends); the green and purple palette fuses the monument with the corpse.
What would kill it — Realistic skin instead of patinated stone or metal — the moment the face becomes a portrait of a living person, the idea of looking at an already-existing monument, not a man, is lost.
Principles: —
To verify against the image: It is not clarified whether the green colour is a deliberate reference to bronze patina or to marble covered in moss — both readings are visually possible.
06 · Varsovie 1975, Théâtre des Nations, Entrée (1975)
What it is — Lithographic signage poster for the Warsaw edition of the international theatre festival Théâtre des Nations, 1975, 98.4 × 67.3 cm — a functional entrance marker, not an announcement of a performance.
Composition — The entire surface is saturated red; at the top a black plate with "Varsovie 1975" (white lettering), below it a cream/gold plate with a gold border and "THÉÂTRE DES NATIONS" — both plates imitate museum or monument nameplates. Below, hand-lettered "ENTRÉE" in large black lettering and a white arrow pointing right.
Colour — A single saturated red ground carries everything; the two plates (black, cream-gold) give an information hierarchy (city/year vs. festival name), black/white for the functional, urgent message (enter here).
Typography — Two registers: neat, "official" lettering on the plates (city, festival) and hand-drawn, quickly written lettering for "ENTRÉE" — the difference in lettering signals the difference in function (ceremonial announcement vs. practical instruction).
Message — Three-second test: red + arrow + "ENTRÉE" readable as "enter here" even to someone who knows neither French nor Polish — functional signage that works as a poster and as a sign at the same time.
Why exactly this way — The task is not to sell a show but to direct a physical audience across the festival grounds in a foreign city (Warsaw, international guests) — hence two layers of text: "ceremonial" (name/year/festival) and operational (arrow, entrance).
What would kill it — If "ENTRÉE" and the arrow were written in the same neat lettering as the plates above — the functional message would be lost in decoration; the difference in register is the message.
Principles: —
To verify against the image: The exact location (which building/entrance in Warsaw) is not confirmed.
07 · Aleksander Fredro — Damy i huzary, Teatr TV Kwadrat (1977)
What it is — Offset lithographic poster for a television theatre adaptation of Aleksander Fredro's comedy "Damy i huzary" (Teatr TV "Kwadrat"), 1977, 96.8 × 66.5 cm.
Composition — A saturated yellow field; in the centre a smaller framed rectangle (grey ground) with two figures in profile facing each other: a lady with an ornamented white-green hairstyle/hat and the black silhouette of an officer-hussar with a moustache. Below the framed field, a thin line with arrows at both ends (like a technical dimension line on a drawing) and the text "Teatr TV Kwadrat" — the scene appears literally "measured" by an instrument.
Colour — A full yellow field, grey background inside the frame, white-green lady, black hussar silhouette — the contrast of warm yellow against cool grey/black sets the central scene apart as a "sample under glass".
Typography — Hand-written cursive lettering for the title (author's name and the play's title) above the framed scene — the cursive carries the written/handwritten tone of the comedy of manners.
Message — The lady and the soldier in profile, "measured" by a dimension line = a witty, "scientific" distance toward a drawing-room comedy about courtship and soldiers — Fredro's humour translated into the humour of representation (drawing as diagram).
Why exactly this way — Fredro is a writer of light, witty comedies of manners; the dimension line is a visual joke that treats the romantic scene as a technical object of measurement — the same degree of irony as in the comedy's own text.
What would kill it — Removing the dimension line — without it, only an illustration of two figures remains; with it, the scene becomes a comment on the very act of depicting/measuring human relationships.
Principles:Hand gesture against the cutTo verify against the image: The exact year the TV adaptation aired is not confirmed.
What it is — Advertising poster for the French cigarette brand Gitanes (Seita), 1991 — one of the rare Western commercial clients in the body of work, made in the last decade of the career.
Composition — A square sign in the shape of a standard traffic prohibition sign (red border, blue diagonal line across the symbol), but inside, instead of a cigarette, stands the silhouette of the well-known Gitanes logo: a flamenco dancer in motion, with legs that leave a trail of smoke or movement behind them. Below the sign is the pink cursive logotype "gitanes".
Colour — The red-blue-white palette of the traffic sign, a universally recognisable convention, plus the black silhouette of the dancer and the pink brand logotype. The sign's colours are deliberately borrowed from a system that sells nothing but prohibits.
Typography — The existing cursive Gitanes brand logotype, not Tomaszewski's own letter design. The only work in this note where the typography is not his hand but someone else's trademark.
Message — Three-second test: a recognisable "prohibited" sign, but with marketing content instead of a prohibition — a witty inversion of a universal visual language. The message works precisely because the viewer first reads "prohibition", and only then realises it's an advertisement.
Why exactly this way — By 1991, cigarette advertising in Europe is already under pressure from regulation and no-smoking signs in public space. Tomaszewski turns precisely that visual sign of prohibition into an advertising vehicle — the same logic of analogy, a borrowed form carrying new meaning, as with the Cyrk spirals, here applied to ready-made, borrowed iconography.
What would kill it — If the sign were drawn as an original symbol rather than as a recognisable traffic sign. The whole joke depends on instant recognition of the existing visual convention that is then betrayed.
50-ème Anniversaire de l'Union Internationale de la Marionnette (1978) — poster for the fiftieth anniversary of the International Puppeteers' Union. record
Jan August Kisielewski, Karykatury (1978) — poster/catalogue for a caricature exhibition. record
"Pralnia" (Laundry Tym S.) (1981) — late work, evidence of the method's continuity into the eighth decade of his career. record
Principles — summary
Hand gesture against the cut — a hand-guided, deliberately imperfect gesture (letter, line) as the opposite register to a precise, machine-neat cut; shared with Saul Bass.
Analogy instead of illustration — a borrowed form (spiral, traffic sign) carries meaning instead of a literal picture of the object.
One image, one word — the whole message reduced to a single graphic gesture (a broken letter, one transformation).
Joke with a delay — the message is built as a joke with a delayed "fuse": first shock/surprise of recognition, only then the smile of understanding (Gitanes, Cyrk).
Transformation through a sequence of figures — the same motif repeated in a series with progressive change (Urok Szatana) translates a filmic sequence into a single still image.
A series with no fixed formula — the body of work deliberately avoids a fixed layout or regime (unlike Lester Beall and Alvin Lustig); each work changes technique, not just the motif — the "chord" is never repeated.
Twisting a familiar sign — an existing universal visual sign (traffic sign, museum plaque) taken over and subverted for a new purpose.
Bridge to practice: poster · graphic design · motion
Poster
Before opening Illustrator, you choose which "chord" of this poster is different from the last one — Tomaszewski never repeats the same layout/technique twice in a row. If the last poster was clean vector, the next is drawn by hand and scanned; if the last was dense, the next is reduced to a single gesture.
Graphic design
It starts from a ready-made, universally known visual sign (traffic, warning, ISO) whose content is replaced — like the Gitanes prohibition-that-advertises. The test: does the viewer first read the OLD meaning of the sign, and only then the new one? If they read only the new meaning right away, the witty inversion is lost.
Motion
The sequence (Urok Szatana) is treated as proof that three static images can carry montage — in AE, three keyframes of the same character are made in three degrees of "decay" of form (colour, density, contour) and played as a cut, not as a morph; the cut between states is stronger than a smooth transition.
Bad imitation
Someone copies "hand-drawn" lettering with Illustrator's brush tool at perfectly consistent pressure — the result is a decorative font that LOOKS clumsy but is actually perfectly repeatable, so it loses exactly what clumsiness carries: proof that someone actually made a mistake. Someone makes a "witty" poster with a double meaning that is immediately clear to the reader the moment they see the image — without delay, without a moment where the brain first reads one thing and then another — so the joke doesn't "land", it merely illustrates a pun. Someone attempts a series of posters with deliberately different technique in each, but without a single shared reason (same client, same theme) to justify the differences — the result is unsystematic, not a "jazz variation" but a lack of decision.
The brief through their eyes
First move: look for a ready-made, universally known sign tied to cinema or film strip and invert its meaning instead of drawing a new illustration — analogy instead of a literal image. The poster carries only that one inverted sign, the festival name, dates and place, reduced to a single gesture, with no added decoration. The typography is simple, capitals, the grid strict, so that all focus falls on that one inverted sign. From the poster into the booklet, the sign passes through a series of figures — each day of the festival gets its own degree of transformation of the same motif, like a film sequence told in still steps. The ticket carries one frame from that sequence, each different, but recognisably from the same series. The ten-second motion title sequence doesn't join those frames with a smooth transition but cuts them one after another — three to five states of the same sign as a pure cut, not a morph.
Exercises
Take any ready-made, universally recognisable sign (traffic, ISO, safety pictogram) and replace its content with a theme from graphic design — verify whether the viewer first reads the OLD meaning. Draw the same small motif three times with the same tools but each time deliberately in a different technique (brush, scissors, marker) and compare how much each version changes the "tone" of the same idea.
Motion study
A 5-second exercise in AE or MOHO: one character/shape shown in three static states (full density → transparent → completely transformed, like Urok Szatana), cut together as three edits with not a single smooth transition. Constraint: three frames, zero interpolation between them — the audience "completes" the motion themselves.
Rebuilding the benchmark
The benchmark is Moore (work 03) — measure from the image the position and proportion of each letter block and the gap between "M" and "OORE" in % of the format (letter width, gap width, position of the grey photographic fragment), then rebuild it in Illustrator in 45 minutes without looking at the original, making your own "gap that carries form" with a different word.